pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:23:18 -0500
Message-ID: <17546.1267546998@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <603c8f071003020816j77b3ec63wbad0415df003c0f1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201002252346.o1PNkXG07892@momjian.us>
	<9477.1267142614@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<603c8f071003020816j77b3ec63wbad0415df003c0f1@mail.gmail.com>

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Partially.  There are stats now but autovacuum is not bright about
>> when to update them.

> Is that something you're planning to fix for 9.0?  If not, we at least
> need to document what we intend for people to do about it.

I want to look at it, but I'm not sure whether the fix will be small
enough that we want to put it in during beta.

			regards, tom lane



view thread (23+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <17546.1267546998@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../17546.1267546998@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/17546.1267546998@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, robertmhaas@gmail.com, bruce@momjian.us, books@ejurka.com
  Subject: Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?
  In-Reply-To: <17546.1267546998@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox