From: Loic Petit <tls.wydd@free.fr>
To: scott.marlowe@gmail.com
Cc: max@nts.biz.ua
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Large number of tables slow insert
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 01:47:36 +0100
Message-ID: <1775c5ea0808231747m71c4e75fn9b5c45ed604edfe8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
I was a bit confused about the read and write sorry ! I understand what you
mean...
But do you think that the IO cost (of only one page) needed to handle the
index writing is superior than 300ms ? Because each insert in any of these
tables is that slow.
NB: between my "small" and my "big" tests the only difference is the number
of table (10 and 3000), there is almost the same amount of on-disk data
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tls.wydd@free.fr, scott.marlowe@gmail.com, max@nts.biz.ua
Subject: Re: Large number of tables slow insert
In-Reply-To: <1775c5ea0808231747m71c4e75fn9b5c45ed604edfe8@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox