From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alessandro Baretta <a.baretta@studio.baretta.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: NAMEDATALEN and performance
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 10:50:45 -0500
Message-ID: <19764.1164815445@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <456D6FAB.4030400@studio.baretta.com>
References: <456D6FAB.4030400@studio.baretta.com>
Alessandro Baretta <a.baretta@studio.baretta.com> writes:
> I am considering the possibility of rebuilding the server with
> NAMEDATALEN equal to 256. I have seen an interesting thread [1] about
> the performance impact of raising NAMEDATALEN, but it did not seem
> conclusive.
More to the point, tests done on 7.2-era code shouldn't be assumed to be
relevant to modern PG releases. I think you'll need to do your own
benchmarking if you want to find out the costs of doing this.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, a.baretta@studio.baretta.com
Subject: Re: NAMEDATALEN and performance
In-Reply-To: <19764.1164815445@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox