From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: arnaulist@andromeiberica.com
Cc: PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: How PostgreSQL handles multiple DDBB instances?
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 14:04:48 -0400
Message-ID: <19775.1180116288@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <465719D5.9040107@andromeiberica.com>
References: <4656A3BE.1070409@andromeiberica.com>
<8684.1180103080@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<465719D5.9040107@andromeiberica.com>
Arnau <arnaulist@andromeiberica.com> writes:
>> Can you instead run things with one postmaster per machine and one
>> database per customer within that instance? From a performance
>> perspective this is likely to work much better.
> What I meant is just have only one postmaster per server and a lot of
> databases running in it.
OK, we are on the same page then. Should work fine. I think I've heard
of people running installations with thousands of DBs in them. You'll
want to test it a bit of course ...
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, arnaulist@andromeiberica.com
Subject: Re: How PostgreSQL handles multiple DDBB instances?
In-Reply-To: <19775.1180116288@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox