pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Craig A. James <cjames@modgraph-usa.com>
Cc: Chris <dmagick@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Postgres gets stuck
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 22:51:12 -0400
Message-ID: <19950.1147402272@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4463EE89.8010103@modgraph-usa.com>
References: <446135F9.1060608@modgraph-usa.com>
	<4461391D.2000800@gmail.com>
	<44635DFE.1060509@modgraph-usa.com>
	<18707.1147392206@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<4463EE89.8010103@modgraph-usa.com>

"Craig A. James" <cjames@modgraph-usa.com> writes:
> I guess I misinterpreted the Postgress manual, which says (in 31.9, "C Language Functions"),

>     "When allocating memory, use the PostgreSQL functions palloc and pfree
>     instead of the corresponding C library functions malloc and free."

> I imagined that perhaps palloc/pfree used mutexes for something.  But if I understand you, palloc() and pfree() are just wrappers around malloc() and free(), and don't (for example) make their own separate calls to brk(2), sbrk(2), or their kin.

Correct.  palloc/pfree are all about managing the lifetime of memory
allocations, so that (for example) a function can return a palloc'd data
structure without worrying about whether that creates a long-term memory
leak.  But ultimately they just use malloc/free, and there's certainly
not any threading or mutex considerations in there.

> No threading anywhere.  None of the libraries use threads or mutexes.  It's just plain old vanilla C/C++ scientific algorithms.

Darn, my best theory down the drain.

>> Or it could be a garden variety glibc bug.  How up-to-date is your
>> platform?

> I guess this is the next place to look.

Let us know how it goes...

			regards, tom lane



view thread (7+ messages)

Message-ID: <19950.1147402272@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../19950.1147402272@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/19950.1147402272@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, cjames@modgraph-usa.com, dmagick@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Postgres gets stuck
  In-Reply-To: <19950.1147402272@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox