From: Chris Hoover <revoohc@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Memory Usage Question
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:54:48 -0500
Message-ID: <1d219a6f0601091054q70283291v9deba2cb3c7b8fe@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Question,
How exactly is Postgres and Linux use the memory?
I have serveral databases that have multi GB indexes on very large tables.
On our current servers, the indexes can fit into memory but not the data
(servers have 8 - 12 GB). However, my boss is wanting to get new servers
for me but does not want to keep the memory requirements as high as they are
now (this will allow us to get more servers to spread our 200+ databases
over).
Question, if I have a 4GB+ index for a table on a server with 4GB ram, and I
submit a query that does an index scan, does Postgres read the entire index,
or just read the index until it finds the matching value (our extra large
indexes are primary keys).
I am looking for real number to give to my boss the say either having a
primary key larger than our memory is bad (and how to clearly justfify it),
or it is ok.
If it is ok, what are the trade offs in performance?\
Obviously, I want more memory, but I have to prove the need to my boss since
it raises the cost of the servers a fair amount.
Thanks for any help,
Chris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: revoohc@gmail.com, pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Memory Usage Question
In-Reply-To: <1d219a6f0601091054q70283291v9deba2cb3c7b8fe@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox