From: Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
To: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Adrian Moisey <adrian@careerjunction.co.za>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: big database performance
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 17:59:58 +0100
Message-ID: <1d4e0c10801090859l55b35082r5992a1bb81f1ec32@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47848575.8000007@commandprompt.com>
References: <4784835A.8070604@careerjunction.co.za>
<47848575.8000007@commandprompt.com>
Hi Joshua,
On Jan 9, 2008 9:27 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> wal_sync_method = open_sync
Do you recommend it in every situation or just because data are on a
SAN? Do you have any numbers/real cases explaining this choice.
Thanks.
--
Guillaume
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: guillaume.smet@gmail.com, jd@commandprompt.com, adrian@careerjunction.co.za
Subject: Re: big database performance
In-Reply-To: <1d4e0c10801090859l55b35082r5992a1bb81f1ec32@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox