From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: index usage
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:33:41 -0500
Message-ID: <20030117103341.E23422@mail.libertyrms.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87109443711.20030117200814@sarkor.com>
References: <10597430257.20030117164800@sarkor.com>
<11751.1042815424@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<87109443711.20030117200814@sarkor.com>
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 08:08:14PM +0500, Timur Irmatov wrote:
> Well, I've a seen a lot of people on pgsql-general mailing list with
> problems with dates, timestamps, and I was just scared of using
> PostreSQL date and time types and functions..
What problems? The only problems I know of with datetime stuff are
on those machines with the utterly silly glibc hobbling, and even
that has been worked around in recent releases. I think the date and
time handling in PostgreSQL beats most systems. It just works, and
handles all the time-zone conversions for you and everything.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: andrew@libertyrms.info
Subject: Re: index usage
In-Reply-To: <20030117103341.E23422@mail.libertyrms.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox