From: Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>
To: Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: go for a script! / ex: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:59:24 -0700
Message-ID: <20031010225924.GC8664@perrin.nxad.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x7wubcon3h.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com>
References: <007901c38f2b$0b585590$2802a8c0@webbased10>
<200310101034.52073.josh@agliodbs.com>
<3F86F5BB.90605@chuckie.co.uk>
<x7wubcon3h.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com>
> NB> So far:
>
> NB> shared_buffers = 1/16th of total memory
> NB> effective_cache_size = 80% of the supposed kernel cache.
>
> Please take into account the blocksize compiled into PG, too...
Would anyone object to a patch that exports the blocksize via a
readonly GUC? Too many tunables are page dependant, which is
infuriating when copying configs from DB to DB. I wish pgsql had some
notion of percentages for values that end with a '%'. -sc
--
Sean Chittenden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: sean@chittenden.org, khera@kcilink.com
Subject: Re: go for a script! / ex: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
In-Reply-To: <20031010225924.GC8664@perrin.nxad.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox