From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Vitaly Belman <vitalib@012.net.il>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL caching
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 09:17:35 -0700
Message-ID: <200405260917.35537.josh@agliodbs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1673440625.20040526173356@012.net.il>
References: <20792805375.20040521203337@012.net.il>
<40B3C792.3020106@outputservices.com>
<1673440625.20040526173356@012.net.il>
Vitaly,
> I am using the newer 7.5dev native Windows port. For this reason I
> don't think that IN will cause any trouble (I read that this issue was
> resolved in 7.4).
Well, for performance, all bets are off for the dev Windows port. Last I
checked, the Win32 team was still working on *stability* and hadn't yet even
looked at performance. Not that you can't improve the query, just that it
might not fix the problem.
Therefore ... your detailed feedback is appreciated, especially if you can
compare stuff to the same database running on a Linux, Unix, or BSD machine.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, vitalib@012.net.il
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL caching
In-Reply-To: <200405260917.35537.josh@agliodbs.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox