From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Joel Fradkin <jfradkin@wazagua.com>
Cc: 'David Brown' <time@bigpond.net.au>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: ok you all win what is best opteron (I dont want a hosed system again)
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 14:19:15 -0700
Message-ID: <200505141419.15810.josh@agliodbs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00e201c558b1$730ffb10$797ba8c0@jfradkin>
References: <00e201c558b1$730ffb10$797ba8c0@jfradkin>
Joel,
> The two worst queries (our case and audit applications) I created
> denormalized files and maintain them through code. All reporting comes off
> those and it is lightning fast.
This can often be called for. I'm working on a 400GB data warehouse right
now, and almost *all* of our queries run from materialized aggregate tables.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, jfradkin@wazagua.com, time@bigpond.net.au
Subject: Re: ok you all win what is best opteron (I dont want a hosed system again)
In-Reply-To: <200505141419.15810.josh@agliodbs.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox