From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Select performance vs. mssql
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 20:20:39 -0400
Message-ID: <20050525002039.GA27519@mathom.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200505241635.14558.josh@agliodbs.com>
References: <20050524191328.58243.qmail@web53110.mail.yahoo.com>
<200505241635.14558.josh@agliodbs.com>
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 04:35:14PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>Pretty much. There has been discussion about allowing index-only access to
>"frozen" tables, i.e. archive partitions. But it all sort of hinges on
>someone implementing it and testing ....
Is there any way to expose the planner estimate? For some purposes it's
enough to just give a rough ballpark (e.g., a google-esque "results 1-10
of approximately 10000000") so a user knows whether its worth even
starting to page through.
Mike Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mstone+postgres@mathom.us
Subject: Re: Select performance vs. mssql
In-Reply-To: <20050525002039.GA27519@mathom.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox