From: hubert lubaczewski <hubert.lubaczewski@eo.pl>
To: PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: strategies for optimizing read on rather large tables
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 14:13:19 +0200
Message-ID: <20050604121319.GA25309@eo.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.sruhbejjth1vuj@localhost>
References: <20050604081742.GA29123@eo.pl>
<op.srue0eroth1vuj@localhost>
<20050604114132.GB21031@eo.pl>
<op.sruhbejjth1vuj@localhost>
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 02:07:52PM +0200, PFC wrote:
> don't forget to mention all the index columns in the order by, or
> the planner won't use it.
of course.
i understand the concept. actually i find kind of ashamed i did not try
it before.
anyway - thanks for great tip.
depesz
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 188B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: hubert.lubaczewski@eo.pl, lists@boutiquenumerique.com
Subject: Re: strategies for optimizing read on rather large tables
In-Reply-To: <20050604121319.GA25309@eo.pl>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox