From: Mark Rae <mrae@purplebat.com>
To: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>
Cc: Mohan, Ross <RMohan@arbinet.com>
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Projecting currentdb to more users
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 21:06:09 +0100
Message-ID: <20050712200609.GA24958@purplebat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1121193674.8208.236.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
References: <CC74E7E10A8A054798B6611BD1FEF4D307966FF5@vamail01.thexchange.com>
<1121193674.8208.236.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 01:41:14PM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 13:24, Mohan, Ross wrote:
> > From AMD's suit against Intel. Perhaps relevant to some PG/AMD issues.
> Well, this is, right now, just AMD's supposition about Intel's
> behaviour, I'm not sure one way or the other if Intel IS doing this.
I think its more a case of AMD now having solid evidence to back
up the claims.
This discovery, and that fact that you could get round it by
toggling some flags, was being discussed on various HPC mailing
lists around about the beginning of this year.
-Mark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mrae@purplebat.com, smarlowe@g2switchworks.com, RMohan@arbinet.com, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Projecting currentdb to more users
In-Reply-To: <20050712200609.GA24958@purplebat.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox