pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Creager <Robert_Creager@LogicalChaos.org>
Cc: Robert Creager <Robert_Creager@StorageTek.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, Andy Hewitt III <ralph_hewitt_iii@StorageTek.com>
Subject: Re: Huge performance problem between 7.4.1 and 8.0.3 - CS
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 14:36:50 -0600
Message-ID: <20050723143650.5678061a@thunder.logicalchaos.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050719224908.15415222@thunder.logicalchaos.org>
References: <20050718114952.00004ac5@C118181.stortek.com>
	<15472.1121709173@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20050719105014.00007635@C118181.stortek.com>
	<7322.1121792062@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20050719120951.00002520@C118181.stortek.com>
	<20050719224908.15415222@thunder.logicalchaos.org>


I've now backed off to version 7.4.1, which doesn't exhibit the problems that
8.0.3 does.  I guess I'll wait 'till the next version and see if any progress
has occurred.

Rob

When grilled further on (Tue, 19 Jul 2005 22:49:08 -0600),
Robert Creager <Robert_Creager@logicalchaos.org> confessed:

> When grilled further on (Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:09:51 -0600),
> Robert Creager <Robert_Creager@StorageTek.com> confessed:
> 
> > On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:54:22 -0400
> > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hmm, I hadn't thought about the possible impact of multiple concurrent
> > > vacuums.  Is the problem caused by that, or has performance already gone
> > > into the tank by the time the cron-driven vacuums are taking long enough
> > > to overlap?
> > 
> > 
> > I'll re-start the database, vacuum full analyze and restart the runs without
> the
> > cron vacuum running.
> > 
> 
> It took a few hours, but the problem did finally occur with no vacuum running
on
> 803.  CS is averaging 72k.  I cannot quantitatively say it took longer to
> reproduce than with the vacuums running, but it seemed like it did.
> 
> Can any information be gotten out of this?  Should I try CVS HEAD?
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Thanks,
> Rob
> 
> -- 
>  22:41:36 up 6 days,  2:16,  6 users,  load average: 0.15, 0.21, 0.30
> Linux 2.6.5-02 #8 SMP Mon Jul 12 21:34:44 MDT 2004


-- 
 14:35:32 up 9 days, 18:10,  5 users,  load average: 2.17, 2.19, 2.15
Linux 2.6.5-02 #8 SMP Mon Jul 12 21:34:44 MDT 2004

view thread (30+ messages)

Message-ID: <20050723143650.5678061a@thunder.logicalchaos.org>
Permalink:  ../20050723143650.5678061a@thunder.logicalchaos.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20050723143650.5678061a@thunder.logicalchaos.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: Robert_Creager@LogicalChaos.org, Robert_Creager@StorageTek.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, ralph_hewitt_iii@StorageTek.com
  Subject: Re: Huge performance problem between 7.4.1 and 8.0.3 - CS
  In-Reply-To: <20050723143650.5678061a@thunder.logicalchaos.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox