pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
To: Alvaro Nunes Melo <al_nunes@atua.com.br>
Cc: PostgreSQL - Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: RAID Configuration Sugestion
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 07:58:08 -0500
Message-ID: <20050830125808.GD22545@wolff.to> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <431452FD.3090402@atua.com.br>
References: <431452FD.3090402@atua.com.br>

On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 09:37:17 -0300,
  Alvaro Nunes Melo <al_nunes@atua.com.br> wrote:
> 
> The server is a Dual Xeon 3.0 with 2 GB RAM and two SCSI disks. Our main 
> doubt is what is the best configuration for the disks. We are thinking 
> about use them in a RAID-0 array. Is this the best option? What do you 
> suggest on partitioning? Separate partitions for the OS, data and pg_xlog?

You don't have a lot of options with just two disks. What are you trying
to accomplish with raid?

Raid 0 will possibly give you some speed up, while raid 1 will give you some
fault tolerance, some speed of of reads, but cost you half your disk space.



view thread (14+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20050830125808.GD22545@wolff.to>
Permalink:  ../20050830125808.GD22545@wolff.to/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20050830125808.GD22545@wolff.to

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: bruno@wolff.to, al_nunes@atua.com.br
  Subject: Re: RAID Configuration Sugestion
  In-Reply-To: <20050830125808.GD22545@wolff.to>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox