pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: High load and iowait but no disk access
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:25:25 -0400
Message-ID: <20050830162525.GU14921@mathom.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bcd92b00545ffeef542f68666144099d@medrium.com>
References: <bcd92b00545ffeef542f68666144099d@medrium.com>

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 09:42:46AM -0400, Rémy Beaumont wrote:
>We have been trying to pinpoint what originally seem to be a I/O 
>bottleneck but which now seems to be an issue with either Postgresql or 
>RHES 3. 

Nope, it's an IO bottleneck.

>The behavior we see is that when running queries that do random reads 
>on disk, IOWAIT goes over 80% and actual disk IO falls to a crawl at a 
>throughput bellow 3000kB/s 

That's the sign of an IO bottleneck.

>The stats of the NetApp do confirm that it is sitting idle. Doing an 
>strace on the Postgresql process shows that is it doing seeks and 
>reads. 
>
>So my question is where is this iowait time spent ? 

Waiting for the seeks. postgres doesn't do async io, so it requests a
block, waits for it to come in, then requests another block, etc. The
utilization on the netapp isn't going to be high because it doesn't have
a queue of requests and can't do readahead because the IO is random. The
only way to improve the situation would be to reduce the latency of the
seeks. If I read the numbers right you're only getting about 130
seeks/s, which ain't great. I don't know how much latency the netapp
adds in the this configuration; have you tried benchmarking
direct-attach disks?

Mike Stone



view thread (12+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20050830162525.GU14921@mathom.us>
Permalink:  ../20050830162525.GU14921@mathom.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20050830162525.GU14921@mathom.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: mstone+postgres@mathom.us
  Subject: Re: High load and iowait but no disk access
  In-Reply-To: <20050830162525.GU14921@mathom.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox