From: Matthew Sackman <matthew@lshift.net>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Massive performance issues
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 19:52:31 +0100
Message-ID: <20050901185231.GA7131@pongo.lshift.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3417DD259@Herge.rcsinc.local>
References: <6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3417DD259@Herge.rcsinc.local>
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:04:54PM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> > Any help most gratefully received (even if it's to say that I should
> be
> > posting to a different mailing list!).
>
> this is correct list. did you run vacuum/analyze, etc?
> Please post vacuum analyze times.
2005-09-01 19:47:08 LOG: statement: vacuum full analyze address;
2005-09-01 19:48:44 LOG: duration: 96182.777 ms
2005-09-01 19:50:20 LOG: statement: vacuum analyze address;
2005-09-01 19:51:48 LOG: duration: 87675.268 ms
I run them regularly, pretty much after every bulk import.
Matthew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: matthew@lshift.net
Subject: Re: Massive performance issues
In-Reply-To: <20050901185231.GA7131@pongo.lshift.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox