pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dalibor Sramek <dali@insula.cz>
To: Merlin Moncure <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Low performance on Windows problem
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 15:02:22 +0200
Message-ID: <20050914130221.GA18466@www.epot.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3417DD31A@Herge.rcsinc.local>
References: <6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3417DD31A@Herge.rcsinc.local>

On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:05:00AM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> 5. do select array_accum(q::text) from generate_series(1,10000) q;

I made the tests you suggested and the pattern is clear. The difference
between local and remote command execution is caused by moving data over
the network. E.g. the command above takes 700 ms locally and 1500 ms
remotely. Remote explain analyze takes exactly the 700 ms.

I downloaded PCATTCP - http://www.pcausa.com/Utilities/pcattcp.htm
and the measured throughput between the two machines is over 10000 kB/s.
PCATTCP allows setting TCP_NODELAY but it had no effect on the transfer
speed. So the difference between local and remote execution should IMHO stay
in the 10 ms range. Definitely not 800 ms. The 8.1 has the same problem.

Just for the record: the server PC is Dell Precision 330 with 3Com 3C920
integrated network card. OS MS Windows Professional 2002 with service pack
2. There is Symantec Antivirus installed - which I have (hopefully)
completely disabled.

Thanks for any help

Dalibor Sramek

-- 
Dalibor Sramek  http://www.insula.cz/dali             \ In the eyes of cats
 /              dalibor.sramek@insula.cz               \  all things
/      >H blog  http://www.transhumanismus.cz/blog.php  \   belong to cats.



view thread (12+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20050914130221.GA18466@www.epot.cz>
Permalink:  ../20050914130221.GA18466@www.epot.cz/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20050914130221.GA18466@www.epot.cz

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: dali@insula.cz, merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com
  Subject: Re: Low performance on Windows problem
  In-Reply-To: <20050914130221.GA18466@www.epot.cz>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox