From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort?
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 14:59:30 -0700
Message-ID: <200510031459.30802.josh@agliodbs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051003215332.GS2241@mathom.us>
References: <31833713.1128111650174.JavaMail.root@elwamui-polski.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
<200510031334.02030.josh@agliodbs.com>
<20051003215332.GS2241@mathom.us>
Michael,
> >Nope, LOTS of testing, at OSDL, GreenPlum and Sun. For comparison, A
> >Big-Name Proprietary Database doesn't get much more than that either.
>
> You seem to be talking about database IO, which isn't what you said.
Right, well, it was what I meant. I failed to specify, that's all.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, mstone+postgres@mathom.us, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort?
In-Reply-To: <200510031459.30802.josh@agliodbs.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox