pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
To: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Cc: xchris <lyralyra@fastmail.fm>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Lists or external TABLE?
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 16:01:37 -0500
Message-ID: <20051004210137.GZ40138@pervasive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <433D06AB.3020409@archonet.com>
References: <1128071781.8112.32.camel@lyra>
	<433D06AB.3020409@archonet.com>

On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 10:34:35AM +0100, Richard Huxton wrote:
> xchris wrote:
> >
> >Let's suppose i need to add an info about addresses (which includes
> >country,city,cap....etc etc).
> >Addresses can vary from 1 to 20 entries..
> >
> >Talking about performance is it better to include a list of addresses in
> >TABLE A or is it better to create an external TABLE B?
> 
> Don't optimise before you have to.
> 
> Do the addresses belong in "A"? If so, put them there. On the other 
> hand, if you want items in "A" to have more than one address, or to 
> share addresses then clearly you will want a separate address table. 
> It's difficult to say more without a clear example of your requirements.
> 
> Even if you choose to alter your design for performance reasons, you 
> should make sure you run tests with realistic workloads and hardware. 
> But first, trust PG to do its job and design your database according to 
> the problem requirements.

On top of what Richard said, 5000 rows is pretty tiny. Even if each row
was 1K wide, that's still only 5MB.

Also, if from a data-model standpoint it doesn't matter which way you
go, I suggest looking at what it will take to write queries against both
versions before deciding. I tend to stay away from arrays because
they tend to be harder to query against.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461



view thread (3+ messages)

Message-ID: <20051004210137.GZ40138@pervasive.com>
Permalink:  ../20051004210137.GZ40138@pervasive.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20051004210137.GZ40138@pervasive.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jnasby@pervasive.com, dev@archonet.com, lyralyra@fastmail.fm
  Subject: Re: Lists or external TABLE?
  In-Reply-To: <20051004210137.GZ40138@pervasive.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox