pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu@skype.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort?
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 05:43:15 -0400
Message-ID: <20051005094315.GX2241@mathom.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1128375790.5882.18.camel@fuji.krosing.net>
References: <31833713.1128111650174.JavaMail.root@elwamui-polski.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
	<200510031334.02030.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<1128372151.28509.1.camel@toonses.gghcwest.com>
	<200510031416.15620.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<1128375790.5882.18.camel@fuji.krosing.net>

On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:43:10AM +0300, Hannu Krosing wrote:
>Just FYI, I run a count(*) on a 15.6GB table on a lightly loaded db and
>it run in 163 sec. (Dual opteron 2.6GHz, 6GB RAM, 6 x 74GB 15k  disks in
>RAID10, reiserfs). A little less than 100MB sec.

And none of that 15G table is in the 6G RAM?

Mike Stone

view thread (112+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20051005094315.GX2241@mathom.us>
Permalink:  ../20051005094315.GX2241@mathom.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20051005094315.GX2241@mathom.us

copy link · copy postgr.es

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: mstone+postgres@mathom.us, hannu@skype.net, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort?
  In-Reply-To: <20051005094315.GX2241@mathom.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox