From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:59:09 -0500
Message-ID: <20051121195909.GP7330@mathom.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ek59omex.fsf@stark.xeocode.com>
References: <BFA6C187.1425C%llonergan@greenplum.com>
<4381E077.80009@rentec.com>
<87ek59omex.fsf@stark.xeocode.com>
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 02:01:26PM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
>I also fear that heading in that direction could push Postgres even further
>from the niche of software that works fine even on low end hardware into the
>realm of software that only works on high end hardware. It's already suffering
>a bit from that.
Well, there are are alread a bunch of open source DB's that can handle
the low end. postgres is the closest thing to being able to handle the
high end.
Mike Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mstone+postgres@mathom.us
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
In-Reply-To: <20051121195909.GP7330@mathom.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox