From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Database restore speed
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 16:46:02 -0500
Message-ID: <20051202214602.GH7330@mathom.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BFB5FB8F.14EA1%llonergan@greenplum.com>
References: <20051202211925.GF6026@ns.snowman.net>
<BFB5FB8F.14EA1%llonergan@greenplum.com>
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 01:24:31PM -0800, Luke Lonergan wrote:
From a performance standpoint no argument, although you're betting that you
>can do parsing / conversion faster than the COPY core in the backend can
Not necessarily; you may be betting that it's more *efficient* to do the
parsing on a bunch of lightly loaded clients than your server. Even if
you're using the same code this may be a big win.
Mike Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mstone+postgres@mathom.us
Subject: Re: Database restore speed
In-Reply-To: <20051202214602.GH7330@mathom.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox