pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Wiles <frank@wiles.org>
To: Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
Cc: vivek@khera.org
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: opinion on disk speed
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:47:18 -0600
Message-ID: <20051209094718.49f7b402.frank@wiles.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7E7E5@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
References: <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7E7E5@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>

On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 17:03:27 -0000
"Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org 
> > [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of 
> > Vivek Khera
>
> > I have a choice to make on a RAID enclosure:
> > 
> > 14x 36GB 15kRPM ultra 320 SCSI drives
> > 
> > OR
> > 
> > 12x 72GB 10kRPM ultra 320 SCSI drives
> > 
> > both would be configured into RAID 10 over two SCSI channels using
> > a megaraid 320-2x card.
>
> 15K drives (well, the Seagate Cheetah X15's that I have a lot of at
> least) can run very hot compared to the 10K's. Might be worth bearing
> (no pun intended) in mind.
> 
> Other than that, without knowing the full specs of the drives, you've
> got 2 extra spindles and a probably-lower-seek time if you go for the
> X15's so that would seem likely to be the faster option.

  I agree, the extra spindles and lower seek times are better if all
  you are concerned about is raw speed.  

  However, that has to be balanced, from an overall perspective, with
  the nice single point of ordering/contact/support/warranty of the
  one vendor. It's a tough call. 

 ---------------------------------
   Frank Wiles <frank@wiles.org>
   http://www.wiles.org
 ---------------------------------




view thread (16+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20051209094718.49f7b402.frank@wiles.org>
Permalink:  ../20051209094718.49f7b402.frank@wiles.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20051209094718.49f7b402.frank@wiles.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: frank@wiles.org, dpage@vale-housing.co.uk, vivek@khera.org
  Subject: Re: opinion on disk speed
  In-Reply-To: <20051209094718.49f7b402.frank@wiles.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox