From: Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: Szabolcs BALLA <szballa@confinsystems.com>
Subject: Re: 7.4.7 vs. 8.1
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:04:54 +0100
Message-ID: <20051212120454.GA3356@uio.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <439D3AC6.1090405@confinsystems.com>
References: <439D3AC6.1090405@confinsystems.com>
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 09:54:30AM +0100, Szabolcs BALLA wrote:
> When I use autovacuum (8.1) is it required to use "vacuum analyze" for
> maintenance or autovacuum is enough?
autovacuum should be enough.
> We have 2 processors (hyperthread) and is it needed to configure the
> psql to use it or is it enough to configure the kernel base only?
Turn _off_ hyperthreading; it's more likely to do harm than good.
> Is 8.1 stable?
Yes. Note that 8.1.1 should be out quite soon.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: sgunderson@bigfoot.com, szballa@confinsystems.com
Subject: Re: 7.4.7 vs. 8.1
In-Reply-To: <20051212120454.GA3356@uio.no>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox