pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Brown <kevin@sysexperts.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Overriding the optimizer
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:20:25 -0800
Message-ID: <20051216052025.GB691@filer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43A22BE3.6020103@modgraph-usa.com>
References: <200512141603.52583.blargity@gmail.com>
	<7484.1134600423@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<1134629567.14248.27.camel@firebolt>
	<200512150148.16125.blargity@gmail.com>
	<1134644526.14248.60.camel@firebolt>
	<43A1C40D.8040006@paradise.net.nz>
	<43A1F6DB.3080805@modgraph-usa.com>
	<43A226E7.7040508@paradise.net.nz>
	<43A22BE3.6020103@modgraph-usa.com>

Craig A. James wrote:
> Hints are dangerous, and I consider them a last resort.

If you consider them a last resort, then why do you consider them to
be a better alternative than a workaround such as turning off
enable_seqscan, when all the other tradeoffs are considered?

If your argument is that planner hints would give you finer grained
control, then the question is whether you'd rather the developers
spend their time implementing planner hints or improving the planner.
I'd rather they did the latter, as long as workarounds are available
when needed.  A workaround will probably give the user greater
incentive to report the problem than use of planner hints.


-- 
Kevin Brown					      kevin@sysexperts.com



view thread (41+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20051216052025.GB691@filer>
Permalink:  ../20051216052025.GB691@filer/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20051216052025.GB691@filer

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: kevin@sysexperts.com
  Subject: Re: Overriding the optimizer
  In-Reply-To: <20051216052025.GB691@filer>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox