From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: Chris Hoover <revoohc@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: 8.1 - pg_autovacuum question
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:26:55 -0300
Message-ID: <20051216202655.GF27602@surnet.cl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d219a6f0512161140o2aad4256lf8e33fe65871f5a0@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1d219a6f0512161140o2aad4256lf8e33fe65871f5a0@mail.gmail.com>
Chris Hoover wrote:
> In PostgreSQL 8.1, is the pg_autovacuum daemon affected by the
> vacuum_cost_* variables? I need to make sure that if we turn
> autovacuuming on when we upgrade to 8.1, we don't cause any i/o
> issues.
What pg_autovacuum daemon? The contrib one? I don't know. The
integrated one? Yes it is; and you can set autovacuum-specific values
in postgresql.conf and table-specific values (used for autovacuum only)
in pg_autovacuum.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@commandprompt.com, revoohc@gmail.com
Subject: Re: 8.1 - pg_autovacuum question
In-Reply-To: <20051216202655.GF27602@surnet.cl>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox