pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
Cc: Charles Sprickman <spork@bway.net>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: SAN/NAS options
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:18:01 -0600
Message-ID: <20051216221801.GT53809@pervasive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <439FC9B8.8020709@paradise.net.nz>
References: <Pine.OSX.4.61.0512140155590.282@office-dhcp-18.bway.net>
	<439FC9B8.8020709@paradise.net.nz>

On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 08:28:56PM +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Another interesting thing to try is rebuilding the database ufs 
> filesystem(s) with 32K blocks and 4K frags (as opposed to 8K/1K or 
> 16K/2K - can't recall the default on 4.x). I found this to give a factor 
> of 2 speedup on random disk access (specifically queries doing indexed 
> joins).

Even if you're doing a lot of random IO? I would think that random IO
would perform better if you use smaller (8K) blocks, since there's less
data being read in and then just thrown away that way.

> Is it mainly your 2 disk machines that are IOPS bound? if so, a cheap 
> option may be to buy 2 more cheetahs for them! If it's the 4's, well how 
> about a 2U U320 diskpack from whomever supplies you the Supermicro boxes?

Also, on the 4 drive machines if you can spare the room you might see a
big gain by putting the tables on one mirror and the OS and transaction
logs on the other.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461



view thread (25+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20051216221801.GT53809@pervasive.com>
Permalink:  ../20051216221801.GT53809@pervasive.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20051216221801.GT53809@pervasive.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jnasby@pervasive.com, markir@paradise.net.nz, spork@bway.net
  Subject: Re: SAN/NAS options
  In-Reply-To: <20051216221801.GT53809@pervasive.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox