From: Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
To: Jignesh K. Shah <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM>
Cc: Richard_D_Levine@raytheon.com, Juan Casero <caseroj@comcast.net>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:22:36 -0600
Message-ID: <20051220192236.GG28771@pervasive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43A83D77.4030205@sun.com>
References: <OF464C8019.B4D88FCD-ON052570DD.0054DA15-052570DD.005C8BB4@ftw.us.ray.com>
<43A83D77.4030205@sun.com>
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:20:55PM -0500, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
> Is pgbench the workload that you prefer? (It already has issues with
> pg_xlog so my guess is it probably won't scale much)
> If you have other workload informations let me know.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: jnasby@pervasive.com, J.K.Shah@Sun.COM, caseroj@comcast.net, pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1
In-Reply-To: <20051220192236.GG28771@pervasive.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox