pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Wiles <frank@wiles.org>
To: Juan Casero <caseroj@comcast.net>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1?
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 13:50:42 -0600
Message-ID: <20051224135042.484c6e32.frank@wiles.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200512212231.55100.caseroj@comcast.net>
References: <43A84D03.7090002@ritek.hu>
	<docq5v$24ea$1@news.hub.org>
	<200512212209.50234.caseroj@comcast.net>
	<200512212231.55100.caseroj@comcast.net>

On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 22:31:54 -0500
Juan Casero <caseroj@comcast.net> wrote:

> Sorry folks.  I had a couple of glasses of wine as I wrote this.
> Anyway I originally wanted the box to have more than two drives so I
> could do RAID 5 but that is going to cost too much.  Also, contrary
> to my statement below it seems to me I should run the 32 bit
> postgresql server on the 64 bit kernel. Would you agree this will
> probably yield the best performance?    I know it depends alot on the
> system but for now this database is about 20 gigabytes. Not too large
> right now but it may grow 5x in the next year.

  You definitely DO NOT want to do RAID 5 on a database server.  That
  is probably the worst setup you could have, I've seen it have lower
  performance than just a single hard disk. 

  RAID 1 and RAID 1+0 are optimal, but you want to stay far away from
  RAID 5.  IMHO RAID 5 is only useful on near line backup servers or
  Samba file servers where space is more important than speed. 

 ---------------------------------
   Frank Wiles <frank@wiles.org>
   http://www.wiles.org
 ---------------------------------




view thread (54+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20051224135042.484c6e32.frank@wiles.org>
Permalink:  ../20051224135042.484c6e32.frank@wiles.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20051224135042.484c6e32.frank@wiles.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: frank@wiles.org, caseroj@comcast.net
  Subject: Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1?
  In-Reply-To: <20051224135042.484c6e32.frank@wiles.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox