pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Creager <Robert_Creager@LogicalChaos.org>
To: Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>
Cc: PGPerformance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Index isn't used during a join.
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:17:05 -0700
Message-ID: <20060110081705.221792f9@thunder.logicalchaos.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060110055818.GA55076@winnie.fuhr.org>
References: <20060109212338.6420af12@thunder.logicalchaos.org>
	<20060110055818.GA55076@winnie.fuhr.org>

When grilled further on (Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:58:18 -0700),
Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> confessed:

> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 09:23:38PM -0700, Robert Creager wrote:
> > I'm working with a query to get more info out with a join.  The base
> > query works great speed wise because of index usage.  When the join is
> > tossed in, the index is no longer used, so the query performance tanks.
> 
> The first query you posted returns 285 rows and the second returns
> over one million; index usage aside, that difference surely accounts
> for a performance penalty.  And as is often pointed out, index scans
> aren't always faster than sequential scans: the more of a table a
> query has to fetch, the more likely a sequential scan will be faster.

Thanks for pointing out the obvious that I missed.  Too much data in the second query.  It's supposed to match (row wise) what was returned from the first query.

Just ignore me for now...

Thanks,
Rob

-- 
 08:15:24 up 3 days, 42 min,  9 users,  load average: 2.07, 2.20, 2.25
Linux 2.6.12-12-2 #4 SMP Tue Jan 3 19:56:19 MST 2006

view thread (11+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20060110081705.221792f9@thunder.logicalchaos.org>
Permalink:  ../20060110081705.221792f9@thunder.logicalchaos.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20060110081705.221792f9@thunder.logicalchaos.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: Robert_Creager@LogicalChaos.org, mike@fuhr.org
  Subject: Re: Index isn't used during a join.
  In-Reply-To: <20060110081705.221792f9@thunder.logicalchaos.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox