From: Michael Crozier <crozierm@conducivetech.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Autovacuum / full vacuum (off-topic?)
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:36:04 -0800
Message-ID: <200601181536.04758.crozierm@conducivetech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060118225257.GY17896@pervasive.com>
References: <dqigaf$1b98$1@news.hub.org>
<200601181115.51850.crozierm@conducivetech.com>
<20060118225257.GY17896@pervasive.com>
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 14:52 pm, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> I think it's a good idea, but you should take a look at the recently
> added functionality that allows you to investigate the contests of the
> FSM via a user function (this is either in 8.1 or in HEAD; I can't
> remember which).
I will look at this when time allows. Perhaps there is a combination of
triggers on stat tables and asynchronous notifications that would provide
this functionality without getting too deep into the vacuum's transaction
logic?
Were it too integrated with the vacuum, it would likely be too much for
contrib/, I assume.
thanks,
Michael
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: crozierm@conducivetech.com
Subject: Re: Autovacuum / full vacuum (off-topic?)
In-Reply-To: <200601181536.04758.crozierm@conducivetech.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox