pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Mindaugas <mind@bi.lt>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Autovacuum / full vacuum
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:55:21 -0300
Message-ID: <20060118165521.GC19933@surnet.cl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <034701c61c46$f427df20$f20214ac@bite.lt>
References: <dqigaf$1b98$1@news.hub.org>
	<20060117145649.GE21092@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
	<608xteerfh.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com>
	<20060117173046.GA4296@surnet.cl>
	<604q42elzl.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com>
	<20592.1137526372@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<034701c61c46$f427df20$f20214ac@bite.lt>

Mindaugas wrote:
> > >> Even a database-wide vacuum does not take locks on more than one table.
> > >> The table locks are acquired and released one by one, as the operation
> > >> proceeds.
> > 
> > > Has that changed recently?  I have always seen "vacuumdb" or SQL
> > > "VACUUM" (without table specifications) running as one long
> > > transaction which doesn't release the locks that it is granted until
> > > the end of the transaction.
> > 
> > You sure?  It's not supposed to, and watching a database-wide vacuum
> > with "select * from pg_locks" doesn't look to me like it ever has locks
> > on more than one table (plus the table's indexes and toast table).
> 
>   Are there some plans to remove vacuum altogether?

No, but there are plans to make it as automatic and unintrusive as
possible.  (User configuration will probably always be needed.)

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                           Developer, http://www.PostgreSQL.org
FOO MANE PADME HUM



view thread (39+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20060118165521.GC19933@surnet.cl>
Permalink:  ../20060118165521.GC19933@surnet.cl/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20060118165521.GC19933@surnet.cl

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, mind@bi.lt, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
  Subject: Re: Autovacuum / full vacuum
  In-Reply-To: <20060118165521.GC19933@surnet.cl>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox