From: Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
To: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Benjamin Arai <barai@cs.ucr.edu>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: 3WARE Card performance boost?
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:05:32 -0600
Message-ID: <20060118230532.GA17896@pervasive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43CE87D1.6010904@commandprompt.com>
References: <00ee01c61c5a$5db2c870$d7cc178a@uni>
<43CE87D1.6010904@commandprompt.com>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:24:17AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Because 3ware does not make a midrange card that has a battery backed
> cache :). That is the only reason. 3ware makes good stuff.
Why worry about battery-backup if he's running with fsync off?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: jnasby@pervasive.com, jd@commandprompt.com, barai@cs.ucr.edu
Subject: Re: 3WARE Card performance boost?
In-Reply-To: <20060118230532.GA17896@pervasive.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox