From: Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>
To: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: James Russell <internationalhobo@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Sequential scan being used despite indexes
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:58:04 -0700
Message-ID: <20060201035803.GA6324@winnie.fuhr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43E02B2F.9070202@commandprompt.com>
References: <3a3a16930601311914w5bd7d1d0hde7b4e495e0deb27@mail.gmail.com>
<43E02B2F.9070202@commandprompt.com>
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 07:29:51PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Any ideas?
>
> What does explain analyze say?
Also, have the tables been vacuumed and analyzed?
--
Michael Fuhr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mike@fuhr.org, jd@commandprompt.com, internationalhobo@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Sequential scan being used despite indexes
In-Reply-To: <20060201035803.GA6324@winnie.fuhr.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox