From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Default autovacuum settings too conservative
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 09:20:08 -0500
Message-ID: <20060207142006.GM1293@mathom.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060207050545.GZ1240@pervasive.com>
References: <20060201211633.GM95850@pervasive.com>
<43E12A03.6070906@zeut.net>
<20060207050545.GZ1240@pervasive.com>
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 11:05:45PM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>I don't really see the logic behind that. Problems caused by inadequate
>vacuuming seem to be much more prevalent than problems caused by vacuum
>impacting the system.
Agreed. If your tables are large enough that a vacuum matters, you
probably shouldn't be blindly running autovacuum anyway.
Mike Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mstone+postgres@mathom.us
Subject: Re: Default autovacuum settings too conservative
In-Reply-To: <20060207142006.GM1293@mathom.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox