From: Evgeny Gridasov <eugrid@fpm.kubsu.ru>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: wal sync method
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:08:19 +0300
Message-ID: <20060227150819.48e48a85.eugrid@fpm.kubsu.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5709.1128146518@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <BF616D3C.104C3%llonergan@greenplum.com>
<1128015863.11474.9.camel@noodles>
<5709.1128146518@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Hi everybody!
Which wal sync method is the fastest under linux 2.6.x?
I'm using RAID-10 (JFS filesystem), 2xXEON, 4 Gb RAM.
I've tried to switch to open_sync which seems to work
faster than default fdatasync, but is it crash-safe?
--
Evgeny Gridasov
Software Engineer
I-Free, Russia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: eugrid@fpm.kubsu.ru
Subject: Re: wal sync method
In-Reply-To: <20060227150819.48e48a85.eugrid@fpm.kubsu.ru>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox