pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] temporary indexes
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:02:32 -0600
Message-ID: <20060228210232.GW82012@pervasive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <440435BC.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov>
References: <44041B68.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov>
	<16076.1141146348@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<440435BC.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov>

On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:36:28AM -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> <digression>
> I'm all for that.  So far, we've been going after the low-hanging fruit
> in our use of PostgreSQL.  When we get to the main applications, we're
> going to be dealing with a lot more in the way of EXISTS clauses.  The
> product we're moving from usually optimized an IN test the same as the
> logically equivalent EXISTS test, and where a difference existed, it
> almost always did better with the EXISTS -- so we encouraged application
> programmers to use that form.  Also, EXISTS works in situations where
> you need to compare on multiple columns, so it is useful in many
> situations where EXISTS or MIN/MAX techniques just don't work.
> </digression>

Maybe it's just the way my twisted mind thinks, but I generally prefer
using a JOIN when possible...
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461



view thread (13+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20060228210232.GW82012@pervasive.com>
Permalink:  ../20060228210232.GW82012@pervasive.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20060228210232.GW82012@pervasive.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jnasby@pervasive.com, Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [PERFORM] temporary indexes
  In-Reply-To: <20060228210232.GW82012@pervasive.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox