From: Casey Allen Shobe <lists@seattleserver.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Using materialized views for commonly-queried subsets
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:25:08 +0000
Message-ID: <200603100225.08152.lists@seattleserver.com> (raw)
I typed up a description of a situation where the only viable option to
improve performance was to use a materialized view, which, when implemented,
was found to improve performance twenty-sevenfold, even with a fairly small
amount of excess data (which is antipated to grow). I thought this might be
of use to anybody else in a similar situation, so I thought I'd post it here.
http://community.seattleserver.com/viewtopic.php?t=11
Feel free to reproduce as you see fit.
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | cshobe@seattleserver.com | 206-381-2800
SeattleServer.com, Inc. | http://www.seattleserver.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: lists@seattleserver.com
Subject: Re: Using materialized views for commonly-queried subsets
In-Reply-To: <200603100225.08152.lists@seattleserver.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox