pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
To: Pallav Kalva <pkalva@livedatagroup.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Vacuum template databases, Urgent: Production problem
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:13:56 -0600
Message-ID: <20060314211355.GV45250@pervasive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4416F2DC.4010400@livedatagroup.com>
References: <4416F2DC.4010400@livedatagroup.com>

On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:44:12AM -0500, Pallav Kalva wrote:
> Hi, 
> 
>   Do we have to vacuum template0 database regularly ? We got this warning 
>   this morning while vacuuming databases. As a part of my daily vacuum job 
>   I do vacuum of quartz, helix_fdc and affiliate databases which are the 
> one's which are heavily updated and used. But today I realized that usps, 
> template1 and template0 is also being used in a transaction somehow based 
> on this (SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;) query.
> Actually we dont do any updates on usps , template1 and templat0 databases 
> but some how still the age(datfrozenxid keeps incrementing. 
>   My question now is do I have to vacuum daily template1 and template0 
>   databse, is there any harm on vacuuming these databases daily ?, since 
>   these are postgres system tables I am kind of worried.  I was told that 
>   template0 is freezed but not sure why the age(datfrozenxid keeps 
>   incrementing.   I am going to vacuum usps from now anyway. We are using 
>   Postgres version 8.0.2 

You should upgrade to 8.0.6; data loss bugs have been fixed in there.

If you never update USPS you can do a vacuum freeze on it and you won't
need to worry about XID rollover. Same with template1. But if they're
small databases it's probably safer just to periodically vacuum (once a
month or so).

If you up to 8.1 and enable autovacuum, it should take care of all of
this for you.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461



view thread (8+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20060314211355.GV45250@pervasive.com>
Permalink:  ../20060314211355.GV45250@pervasive.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20060314211355.GV45250@pervasive.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jnasby@pervasive.com, pkalva@livedatagroup.com
  Subject: Re: Vacuum template databases, Urgent: Production problem
  In-Reply-To: <20060314211355.GV45250@pervasive.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox