From: Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
To: Antoine <melser.anton@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: partitioning
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 03:59:32 -0600
Message-ID: <20060321095931.GY15742@pervasive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92d3a4950603190431p43fd399aq@mail.gmail.com>
References: <92d3a4950603190431p43fd399aq@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 01:31:42PM +0100, Antoine wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there any work on the cards for implementing other partitioning
> strategies? I see mysql 5.1 will have support for hashes and stuff but
> didn't see anything in the todos for postgres.
You'd have to provide a pretty convincing argument for providing hash
partitioning I think. I can't really think of any real-world scenarios
where it's better than other forms.
In any case, the next logical step on the partitioning front is to add
some 'syntactic sugar' to make it easier for people to work with
partitions. I seem to remember some discussion about that, but I don't
recall where it lead to.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: jnasby@pervasive.com, melser.anton@gmail.com
Subject: Re: partitioning
In-Reply-To: <20060321095931.GY15742@pervasive.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox