From: Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
Cc: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>
Cc: Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Adaptec
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 05:46:59 -0600
Message-ID: <20060321114658.GK15742@pervasive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <441FDD7E.7050106@paradise.net.nz>
References: <20060317221116.GA14661@juniper.net>
<8F6490E1-64E2-406B-A559-7DA8BA1EB197@khera.org>
<20060321103219.GD15742@pervasive.com>
<441FDD7E.7050106@paradise.net.nz>
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 11:03:26PM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:15:22PM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
> >
> >>I think FreeBSD has a hard upper limit on the total ram it will use
> >>for disk cache. I haven't been able to get reliable, irrefutable,
> >>answers about it, though.
> >
> >
> >It does not. Any memory in the inactive queue is effectively your 'disk
> >cache'. Pages start out in the active queue, and if they aren't used
> >fairly frequently they will move into the inactive queue. From there
> >they will be moved to the cache queue, but only if the cache queue falls
> >below a certain threshold, because in order to go into the cache queue
> >the page must be marked clean, possibly incurring a write to disk. AFAIK
> >pages only go into the free queue if they have been completely released
> >by all objects that were referencing them, so it's theoretically
> >posisble for that queue to go to 0.
>
> Exactly.
>
> The so-called limit (controllable via various sysctl's) is on the amount
> of memory used for kvm mapped pages, not cached pages, i.e - its a
> subset of the cached pages that are set up for immediate access (the
> others require merely to be shifted from the 'Inactive' queue to this
> one before they can be operated on - a relatively cheap operation).
>
> So its really all about accounting, in a sense - whether pages end up in
> the 'Buf' or 'Inactive' queue, they are still cached!
So what's the difference between Buf and Active then? Just that active
means it's a code page, or that it's been directly mapped into a
processes memory (perhaps via mmap)?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: jnasby@pervasive.com, markir@paradise.net.nz, vivek@khera.org
Subject: Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Adaptec
In-Reply-To: <20060321114658.GK15742@pervasive.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox