From: Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Sequence Scan vs. Index scan
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 13:13:33 +0100
Message-ID: <20060322121333.GB27640@uio.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8398dc6d0603220350x4ee9c298h@mail.gmail.com>
References: <44204107.3040708@mandic.com.br>
<001a01c64d14$80f4a840$8b00000a@reimer>
<8398dc6d0603220350x4ee9c298h@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 08:50:20AM -0300, Alejandro D. Burne wrote:
> Explains:
> ------------
> With SET ENABLE_SEQSCAN TO ON;
> HashAggregate (cost=251306.99..251627.36 rows=11650 width=78)
You'll need to post EXPLAIN ANALYZE results, not just EXPLAIN.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: sgunderson@bigfoot.com
Subject: Re: Sequence Scan vs. Index scan
In-Reply-To: <20060322121333.GB27640@uio.no>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox