pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
To: Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: WAL logging of SELECT ... INTO command
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 07:01:21 -0600
Message-ID: <20060324130121.GE90527@pervasive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060324123902.GA14217@surnet.cl>
References: <20060321122211.GU15742@pervasive.com>
	<1142973230.24487.501.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<dvqqi5$1nmv$1@news.hub.org>
	<20060324100731.GO90527@pervasive.com>
	<20060324123902.GA14217@surnet.cl>

On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 08:39:02AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> 
> > Why would the content of the old_table be unreliable? If we've replayed
> > logs up to the point of the CTAS then any data that would be visible to
> > the CTAS should be fine, no?
> > 
> > Though, the way Tom put it in one of his replies it sounds like WAL
> > doesn't do any kind of statement logging, only data logging. If that's
> > the case I'm not sure that the CTAS would actually get replayed. But I
> > suspect I'm just misunderstanding...
> 
> The CTAS doesn't get logged (nor replayed obviously).  What happens is
> that the involved files are fsync'ed before transaction commit, AFAIR.

Ahh, yes, that sounds right. Might be a nice gain to be had if there was
some way to log the statement, but I suspect getting WAL to support that
would be extremely non-trivial.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461



view thread (21+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20060324130121.GE90527@pervasive.com>
Permalink:  ../20060324130121.GE90527@pervasive.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20060324130121.GE90527@pervasive.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jnasby@pervasive.com, zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu
  Subject: Re: WAL logging of SELECT ... INTO command
  In-Reply-To: <20060324130121.GE90527@pervasive.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox