From: Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
To: Tomaz Borstnar <tomaz.borstnar@over.net>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: experiences needed - how does Itanium2/1.5GHz(4MB) compare to AMD and Intel CPUs as far as Postgresql is concerned
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 06:14:07 -0600
Message-ID: <20060327121407.GZ80726@pervasive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e044kt$teq$1@news.hub.org>
References: <e044kt$teq$1@news.hub.org>
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 08:11:22PM +0100, Tomaz Borstnar wrote:
> Hello!
>
> First tried some searching around, but did not find anything useful
> so I gave up and decided to ask here... I am wondering how do pair of
> 1.5GHz Itanium2(4MB cache) stack up against pair of AMD or Intel server
> CPUs as far as postgresql performance is concerned? Is it worthy or not?
-performance would be a better place to ask, so I'm moving this there.
The general consensus is that your best bet CPU-wise is Opterons.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: jnasby@pervasive.com, tomaz.borstnar@over.net
Subject: Re: experiences needed - how does Itanium2/1.5GHz(4MB) compare to AMD and Intel CPUs as far as Postgresql is concerned
In-Reply-To: <20060327121407.GZ80726@pervasive.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox