From: Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
To: Radovan Antloga <radovan.antloga@siol.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Performance decrease
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:00:07 -0500
Message-ID: <20060420170007.GA49405@pervasive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <015801c66494$ee3d25c0$1e4ba8c0@AR6>
References: <011b01c6648e$067ee170$1e4ba8c0@AR6>
<18973.1145547701@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<015801c66494$ee3d25c0$1e4ba8c0@AR6>
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 06:10:21PM +0200, Radovan Antloga wrote:
> I have once or twice a month update on many records (~6000) but
> not so many. I did not expect PG would have problems with
> updating 15800 records.
And generally speaking, it doesn't. But you do need to ensure that
you're vacuuming the database frequently enough. Autovacuum is a good
way to do that.
> My test was on Windows XP SP2.
> I have AMD 64 2.1 GHz cpu with
> 1GB ram.
One think to keep in mind is that the windows code is rather new, so it
is possible to find some performance issues there.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: jnasby@pervasive.com, radovan.antloga@siol.net, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: Performance decrease
In-Reply-To: <20060420170007.GA49405@pervasive.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox