From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: david_list@boreham.org
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:03:49 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <200604252103.k3PL3nM03949@candle.pha.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <444E8DD8.3040504@commandprompt.com>
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> David Boreham wrote:
> >
> >> Actually, that was from an article from this last month that compared
> >> the dual core intel to the amd. for every dollar spent on the intel,
> >> you got about half the performance of the amd. Not bigotry. fact.
> >>
> >> But don't believe me or the other people who've seen the difference. Go
> >> buy the Intel box. No skin off my back.
> >>
> > I've been doing plenty of performance evaluation on a parallel application
> > we're developing here : on Dual Core Opterons, P4, P4D. I can say that
> > the Opterons open up a can of wupass on the Intel processors. Almost 2x
> > the performance on our application vs. what the SpecCPU numbers would
> > suggest.
>
> Because Stone Cold Said So!
I'll believe someone who uses 'wupass' in a sentence any day!
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, jd@commandprompt.com, david_list@boreham.org
Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
In-Reply-To: <200604252103.k3PL3nM03949@candle.pha.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox