From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Running on an NFS Mounted Directory
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:57:06 -0400
Message-ID: <20060427175704.GI31328@mathom.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060427175016.GH97354@pervasive.com>
References: <20060427132452.GG31328@mathom.us>
<C0764241.2CFE%ketema@gmail.com>
<20060427140417.GH31328@mathom.us>
<20060427175016.GH97354@pervasive.com>
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 12:50:16PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>Yes, but some dedicated storage devices actually provide good
>performance with RAID5. Most simpler solutions give pretty abysmal write
>performance.
dedicated storage device != SAN != NAS. You can get good performance in
a dedicated direct-attach device without paying for the SAN/NAS
infrastructure if you don't need it; you don't have to go right from EMC
to PERC with nothing in the middle.
Mike Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mstone+postgres@mathom.us
Subject: Re: Running on an NFS Mounted Directory
In-Reply-To: <20060427175704.GI31328@mathom.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox