From: Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
To: Scott Sipe <cscotts@mindspring.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Super-smack?
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 13:54:49 +0200
Message-ID: <20060501115449.GC11061@uio.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92F10BE1-B193-4EEA-877A-9260B55C2844@mindspring.com>
References: <92F10BE1-B193-4EEA-877A-9260B55C2844@mindspring.com>
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 03:05:54AM -0500, Scott Sipe wrote:
> So, my question is, before I do any further digging, is super-smack
> flawed?
It's sort of hard to say without looking at the source -- it certainly isn't
a benchmark I've heard of before, and it's also sort of hard to believe a
benchmark whose focus seems to be so thoroughly on one database (MySQL). The
site claims (about PostgreSQL) support that "it looks like it works";
certainly not a good start for fair benchmarking :-)
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: sgunderson@bigfoot.com, cscotts@mindspring.com
Subject: Re: Super-smack?
In-Reply-To: <20060501115449.GC11061@uio.no>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox